- Land market and housing
- Media, communication and languages
- Living conditions and well-being
- Employment and labour market
- Population, demography and census
- Migration
- Enterprise
- Finance
- Luxembourg
- Longitudinal data
- Individual
- Household
- Living Conditions
- Social Environment : 2
- Housing Conditions (Human Environment) : 4
- Living Conditions : 39
- Transport and mobility
- Psychology
- Great Region
- Survey data
- Individual
- Education, teaching & training
- Migration
- Luxembourg
- Survey data
- Individual
- Human Environment : 8
- Industry and management
- Enterprise
- Luxembourg
- Survey data
- Company, Enterprise
- Land market and housing
- Media, communication and languages
- Living conditions and well-being
- Health
- Employment and labour market
- Population, demography and census
- Migration
- Enterprise
- Finance
- France
- Germany
- Belgium
- Longitudinal data
- Individual
- Household
- Housing Conditions (Human Environment) : 10
Panel Socio-Economique Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg III (PSELL3)
Data by theme
Data by country
Data type
Data unit
Socio-Economic Panel of Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg III (PSELL3)
Database keywords :
Variable keywords :
PSELL 3 (Panel Socio-Economique Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg) is a survey conducted amongst people and households residing in the Grand Duchy with the aim of gaining an understanding of their living conditions. The socioeconomic panel was first constituted in 2003 and is used to build and test social and economic indicators and assess the impact of economic and social policies on the population's living conditions, particularly in terms of income, work, social security, education, health, housing, transport, consumption and savings.
Enquête Mobilité des Frontaliers (EMF)
Data by theme
Data by country
Data type
Data unit
Cross-border Worker Mobility Survey (EMF)
The first phase of the Cross-border Worker Mobility Survey was conducted in the autumn of 2010. The field of study comprised cross-border workers living within daily commuting range of their place of work, of whom there were 130,300 (from a total of 146,600 such workers) in December 2009 (source: IGSS). The sample was spatially stratified into 25 residential sectors, and a total of 40,000 letters and questionnaires were sent out. This batch contained the first phase of the questionnaire, which comprised the usual topics of a 'transport survey', while also being specially adapted to be presented on paper (nine pages) and self-administered. Thus, the first phase contained the key sociodemographic topics (type of housing, type of household, income category, education) as well as features connected with daily travel (activities on a workday, other regular travel, car, number of kilometres travelled, etc.) The response rate reached over 18% for this initial phase. A second phase was required, however, in order to gather more information about these key indicators concerning cross-border workers' daily travel experience and improve understanding of their practice. The information requested concerned their ideas, beliefs and attitudes, with respect to energy use, modes of transport and residential trajectory. To achieve this, in spring 2011, a follow-up, four-page questionnaire was sent to all those who had responded in the first phase - this time, the response rate was over 51%.
Pratiques culturelles 2009 (Culture 2009)
Data by theme
Data by country
Data type
Data unit
Cultural practices - 2009
Variable keywords :
From September to December 2009, LISER (CEPS/INSTEAD when the survey was conducted) carried out the second large-scale cultural survey commissioned by the Luxembourg Ministry of Culture. The topics covered include sociocultural leisure pursuits, reading habits, use of cultural venues, use of media, etc. Analysis of the data provided a picture of cultural practices in 2009 that could be compared with the first survey, conducted in 1999, to see the changes that had occurred. A total of 2,000 people aged 15 or over, seen as representing Luxembourg society, were questioned (note that the panel grew, as it comprised only 1,600 people in 1999). Questions were asked about every aspect of their cultural practice: museums, cinema, theatre, literature, written and audiovisual press, live and recorded entertainment, and music, including their 'mode of consumption' (frequency, weekdays, weekends, or holidays, for example) and, lastly, about their overall satisfaction with what was available in Luxembourg in this respect.
Enquête relative à la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises (RSE 2008)
Data by theme
Data by country
Data type
Data unit
Survey concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (RSE)
This is a data base about Corporate Social Responsibility, compiled by the LISER (CEPS/INSTEAD when the survey was conducted) business research unit with the support of the Luxembourg Institute for Social Mobility (IMS Luxembourg). The sample frame was drawn from the list kept by the Luxembourg National Statistics Institute, STATEC. The survey covers almost all sectors of activity, with the parent population comprising 3,296 businesses, from which a sample of 2,511 was compiled, by including all companies in the parent population employing more than 50 workers and carrying out a stratified random survey of companies with 10 to 49 employees. Data was collected by post between mid-September and mid-December 2008, and describes the situation of the various businesses in 2008. Both French and German versions of the questionnaire were sent to the companies taking part. An English version was also available on request. We received 1,144 valid questionnaires. Where information was missing (partial no response) the values were not included.
Panel Socio-Economique Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg III - Frontaliers (PSELL3 Frontaliers)
Data by theme
Data by country
Data type
Data unit
Socio-Economic Panel of Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg III - Borderers (PSELL3 borderers)
Variable keywords :
PSELL 3 - frontalier (Panel Socio-Economique Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg) is a survey conducted amongst people residing in France, Belgium and Germany with the aim of gaining an understanding of their living conditions, particularly in terms of income, work, transport, mobility and concerning them travel patterns place of residence work.