Variable keywords :

Trust : 1

PSELL 3 (Panel Socio-Economique Liewen zu Lëtzebuerg) is a survey conducted amongst people and households residing in the Grand Duchy with the aim of gaining an understanding of their living conditions. The socioeconomic panel was first constituted in 2003 and is used to build and test social and economic indicators and assess the impact of economic and social policies on the population's living conditions, particularly in terms of income, work, social security, education, health, housing, transport, consumption and savings.

Variable keywords :

Corporate Social Responsibility : 27

The survey on ‘Enterprises’ organizational and managerial practices survey (POME) – Luxembourg – 2013’ was conducted between January and March 2013. The survey was run by regular mail on the census of resident legal units of the private sector with at least 15 employees. The response rate was 56%. The number of legal units in the dataset is 1 468. The topics covered are the management practices offered to employees (team work, job rotation, training, information-sharing, quality management, family-friendly policies, incentives, …) as well as the information and communication technologies (Internet, ERP, VPN, cloud, …). This survey interconnected with the survey on ‘working conditions and quality of work life (QVT) – Luxembourg – 2013’ is the first employer-employee dataset available in Luxembourg.

Database keywords :

Corporate Social Responsibility

Variable keywords :

Corporate Social Responsibility : 99

This is a data base about Corporate Social Responsibility, compiled by the LISER (CEPS/INSTEAD when the survey was conducted) business research unit with the support of the Luxembourg Institute for Social Mobility (IMS Luxembourg). The sample frame was drawn from the list kept by the Luxembourg National Statistics Institute, STATEC. The survey covers almost all sectors of activity, with the parent population comprising 3,296 businesses, from which a sample of 2,511 was compiled, by including all companies in the parent population employing more than 50 workers and carrying out a stratified random survey of companies with 10 to 49 employees. Data was collected by post between mid-September and mid-December 2008, and describes the situation of the various businesses in 2008. Both French and German versions of the questionnaire were sent to the companies taking part. An English version was also available on request. We received 1,144 valid questionnaires. Where information was missing (partial no response) the values were not included.

Variable keywords :

Trust : 1

Set up in 1999, the care allowance is the most recent branch of social security. Care is defined as an important, regular need for third party assistance with fulfilling essential needs. The care allowance is intended to cover the expenses incurred by enlisting third party assistance. Beneficiaries of the care allowance are divided into two groups, depending on their place of residence: at home, or in a care facility. The services received by beneficiaries living in care facilities are provided by the facility’s care staff, while care at home is provided by an informal caregiver (a family member or friend), and/or by care workers belonging to a network of carer providers. In its fifth year, the Care Division’s Assessment and Orientation Team wanted to take stock of its work for the first time, through a satisfaction survey of beneficiaries receiving care at home. The survey was carried out in 2006, delivered face-to-face in the beneficiaries’ homes, and completed by 83% of the sample (a representative sample of 1500 beneficiaries). The survey covered the different steps of the process of obtaining care-insurance (procedures, difficulties, and satisfaction, from requesting the application to receiving the “decision letter”). The survey also touched on the services provided, covering, for example, the quality of care, the quality of contact, and treatment by the network. With regard to the survey’s initial results, 84% of beneficiaries report being satisfied or very satisfied with the way the Team handled their case, the way their application was processed, as well as with its services. 84% of beneficiaries report being “satisfied” or “very satisfied”. Concerning these services delivered, satisfaction was slightly lower, but remains very high: 72% of beneficiaries report being “satisfied” or “very satisfied”.